![]() |
| Digital Painting Programs - Are they a nice addition to your art box? |
I was recently chosen as a feature artist for
(Corel) Painter 2018. My work, fitting a certain criteria, will be
displayed on various program extensions and their website for a campaign
of new and exciting brush libraries for Painter 2018 that will be
launched in mid September. (There have been multiple versions of Painter
since 1991)
It is an exciting time for me as I have been
painting in the digital format for 11 years now. It's a validation of my
artistic abilities as well my enthusiasm of the digital medium. Sadly
at this point in time not many artists give the digital medium a thumbs
up. Even from close artist friends and family I get halfhearted support;
a smile when they see something new I've done; a that's nice, then a
change of subject. But you let me show them a traditional piece of my
work and they gush. I recently showed my digital art along side my
traditional and didn't let them know how either was created and they
couldn't tell the difference. So why does the digital medium get so
little respect? I've asked the question often. Perhaps it is a bit of an
elitist attitude and fear of that which we do not understand. Maybe it
is the fear of learning something new. Or is it because it is a newer
medium that is taking over and making it look easier than what older
traditional artists once had to learn? (Well, it might look easier but
it is not. New mediums take time to master just like Oils, Pastels,
Watercolors, Acrylics etc.) Maybe they think it is photocopied or
cloned? Most times, with professionals, that is not the case. Even if
someone is in the early stage of learning a digital medium and they do photo-cloning they learn
from it. Is it different from when artists sit in a museum and paint
from an old-masters work? I think not much. Artists have taught themselves and learned much working from older and wiser established painters works of art for years. You can learn a lot from copying from a really good painter. Looking at their brush stokes and their uses of color you can in a way, pick their brain. This by no means is condoning plagiarism. These studies aren't for sale, only for study purposes in personal use.
How about when Bill Alexander and Bob Ross began teaching their way of painting?
A lot of traditional oil painters took issue what what they were teaching. There are a lot of budding artist they made happy learning to paint their
way. They both taught how to paint on canvas using a layer of specially made white paint as a base...with oils. (Most artists know what can happen when you paint over a layer of white oil pigment as a base) People
came away with finished pieces that made them happy. It gave them
confidence and a sense that maybe oil painting is not so hard. I know
several people that started that way but they then moved from those steps and learned to paint on their own. They began learning to
draw and then to paint with oils the proper way. Many of those new
artists learned other mediums. So how you start and learn is not
necessarily wrong, it just may be different and we all learn and
visualize differently.
I think artists and maybe some collectors fear
they will not be buying a totally unique one of a kind painting if they buy a digital painting. Not
true. Digital can be sold as a single piece printed with a contract
specifying as such or clients can buy the digital file and/or canvas
print, giclee, print on paper etc. to print their own. There are many
options. Price will reflect their choice. I have done as many commissions digitally I have done traditionally. Today's
younger generation have different ideas and they seem to take much easier to the digital medium.
I'm an artist over 50 who has studied art and many mediums since I
was 12 years old. I know the basics, spent years only drawing from
life, painting plein-air and in studio with color pencil, graphite, pastels (oil & soft), watercolor, acrylics, gouache and oil . I became
bored with what I was doing and sat down one day and scanned several
pieces of my work into my Photoshop program and changed the color, added
some textures and papers in various ways and came up with something
new, exciting and vibrant. That was in 2006. I created, using Photoshop,
very traditional looking art and thought the CS6 program would be all I
needed. I bought my first Bamboo pad and pen in 2011 and that purchase
opened new possibilities. Then in 2013 I began using Corel X3. I started
using it more and more. Sometimes working on a piece of art with both
programs. Now in 2017 with Painter 2018, I paint landscapes, portraits, animals, still life etc... with oil brushes and watercolor brushes. I still paint traditional
watercolors and acrylics. I love using my color pencils sketching birds and animals. At times I scan those works and add more
elements I like that don't translate as well with traditional mediums.
The Painter program has revived my art and in a lot of ways made me
fearless. I can change colors and elements with a flip of my thumb and
Intuos Pen. Layers are my friend and so too is my knowledge of the basics of knowledge of art. The "bones" of a proper painting, art mediums and how they work has helped me create better works of art. That sound beginning of drawing and the uses of the different mediums does not fade with digital creations, it will always be the bases of a good painting and something every artist should know.
Not all that I do is digital, not all I do is traditional...I don't want
limitations. I want the sky to be my limit. So maybe look outside the
box and try working digitally. Combine both. Digital painting programs
are a great addition to your Art Box.

No comments:
Post a Comment